JOSEPH PLAZO DIDN’T COME TO PREACH AUTOMATION. HE CAME TO WARN US.

Joseph Plazo Didn’t Come to Preach Automation. He Came to Warn Us.

Joseph Plazo Didn’t Come to Preach Automation. He Came to Warn Us.

Blog Article

The scene was set for celebration. What unfolded was a reckoning.

At the University of the Philippines' famed lecture theater, delegates from NUS, Kyoto, HKUST, and AIM assembled to witness the gospel of AI in finance.

They expected Plazo to hand them a blueprint to machine-driven wealth.
They were wrong.

---

### When a Maverick Started with a Paradox

Joseph Plazo is no stranger to accolades.

As he stepped onto the podium, the room quieted.

“AI can beat the market. But only if you teach it when not to try.”

A chill passed through the room.

It wasn’t a thesis. It was a riddle.

---

### Dismantling the Myth of Machine Supremacy

Plazo didn’t pitch software.
He showed failures— neural nets falling apart under real-world pressure.

“Most models,” he said, “are just statistical mirrors of the past.

Then, with a pause that felt like a punch, he asked:

“ Can it grasp the disbelief as Lehman fell? Not the charts. The *emotion*.”

The silence became the answer.

---

### Tension in the Halls of Thought

They didn’t sit quietly. These were doctoral minds.

A PhD student from Kyoto noted how large language models now detect emotion in text.

Plazo nodded. “Detection is not understanding.”

A data scientist from HKUST proposed that probabilistic models could one day simulate conviction.

Plazo’s reply was metaphorical:
“You can simulate weather. But conviction? That’s lightning. You can’t forecast where it’ll strike. Only feel when it does.”

---

### The Trap Isn’t in the Code—It’s in the Belief

He didn’t bash AI. He bashed our blind obedience to it.

“This isn’t innovation. It’s surrender.”

Yet his own firm uses AI—but wisely.

His company’s systems scan sentiment, order flow, and liquidity.
“But every output is double-checked by human eyes.”

Then came the killer line:
“‘The model told me to do it.’ That’s what we’ll hear after every disaster in the next decade.”

---

### Asia’s Enthusiasm, Interrupted

Nowhere does AI have more believers than Asia.

Dr. Anton Leung, a Singapore-based ethicist, whispered after the talk:
“What Plazo gave us was oxygen in a burning house.”

In a private dialogue among professors, Plazo pressed the point:

“Don’t just teach students to *code* AI. Teach them to *think* with it.”

---

### No Clapping. Just Standing.

The crowd expected a crescendo. They got a challenge.

“The market isn’t math,” he said. “ website It’s human, messy, unpredictable. And if your AI can’t read character, it’ll miss the plot.”

And then, slowly, they stood.

Some said it reminded them of Jobs at Stanford.

He came to remind us: we are still responsible.

Report this page